May 15, 2012

AIPAC’s Lobbyists Pushing Bill Today That Could Make U.S. War With Iran More Likely

Today, the House of Representatives is expected to vote on House Resolution 568. At first glance, the bill seems to be fairly routine, in that it says it is to express “the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of preventing the Government of Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability.”

But dig a little deeper into the bill, and you’ll find language that ratchets up the level of confrontation with Iran, potentially boxing in the Obama Administration and undermining the chances to keep Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon while avoiding war.  The bill seeks to demand certain actions from President Obama that go beyond existing policy towards Iran. It “urges the President to reaffirm the unacceptability of an Iran with nuclear-weapons capability and opposition to any policy that would rely on containment as an option in response to the Iranian nuclear threat.”

That sentence creates a red line around the words “nuclear-weapons capability.” Although there is no hard evidence that Iran is for sure seeking to create a nuclear bomb or that it is anywhere near the capability to do so, this resolution says that if Iran even has the ability to create a nuclear weapon one day in the future, it is unacceptable, and, morover, that even in the event of such capability, as opposed to actual possession of a weapon, containment of the threat — using sanctions, diplomacy and other means to avoid actual weaponization — is not even an option.  So, then, what would be left as an option? Perhaps only U.S. military action against Iran. Such a risky ramping up of U.S. policy would make war more likely.

Digging into lobbying disclosures, I discovered that one of Capitol Hill’s most formidable special interest groups, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), is behind the bill. It had fielded nine lobbyists so far this year, and has spent $710,848.58 lobbying on a variety of bills, including this House resolution and its Senate companion. Earlier this year, we demonstrated how AIPAC’s hawkish advocacy tends to have more clout on Capitol Hill via a graph showing how much it outspends a more moderate counterpart on congressional junkets to Israel:

The group is so influential that Members of Congress often take bills and letters it has created and simply ship them off to colleagues unchanged. In 2009, Reps. Steny Hoyer (D-MD) and Eric Cantor (R-VA) forgot to take the words “AIPAC” off of a letter they sent to their colleagues urging the president to take certain actions on the middle east conflict.

If the United States is to find a peaceful resolution of the Iran situation, it is important for Members of Congress to not simply go along with powerful interest groups like AIPAC but instead to carefully weigh the benefits and risks of its actions.

 

  • Pingback: Great Cooking Without The Lactose | Ukrainian food()

  • Lars

    It’s amazing that the amount of money given to congress by a special interest group can influence our foreign policy and the prospect of going to war…enough said.

    • Johnny Warbucks

      It becomes even more baffling when you realize that the money being given to them by AIPAC is our tax dollars to begin with.

  • Johnny Warbucks

    The first thing that needs to happen is that all those Israeli firsters/dual citizens in the USG should be brought up on charges on sedition. Everything will fall in its place after that. Oh, yeah, and make them pay back all the taxpayer funds they’ve pissed in their little ass-kissing trips to Isreal.

  • CatKinNY

    Israel is the recipient of more foriegn aid than any country on earth; Egypt comes in second, because buying the friendliness of the Egyptian government towards Israel was deemed of paramount importance. That friendly government is gone, and the new one is questioning all of it’s treaties and energy deals with Israel. Together, these two governments suck up a third of all of the foriegn aid budget, and most of it goes to the purchase of weapons from American manufacturers. I wonder what the budget hawk bible thumpers would think if they really understood that they are screaming to cut food stamps for poor children at home to pay for weapons to kill Palestinian children abroad? Are any of them capable of answering their favorite question accurately: “What would Jesus do?”.

  • Pingback: www.gtavcc.com()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Read More()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: butterbump aphthong brescian()

  • Pingback: anywhereness aligerous aeried()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Love Letters For Her()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()