Management mad men at Bain, 1990. If a corporation is a person, his name is Mitt Romney.

“Corporations are people, my friend,” Mitt Romney enthusiastically exclaimed last fall at the Iowa State Fair. Romney was referencing legal principles that give business corporations many of the rights possessed by actual human beings. But Romney is more than the exponent of this idea, he is its embodiment. If Romney wins in November, it will be the first time our country has elected a corporation to be President of the United States. Here are five reasons why that’s the case:

1. Romney’s pitch is a corporation. Romney’s central argument for his candidacy is that his successful record as a corporate executive makes him the right person to grow the U.S. economy.  But there’s a “question of whether Mr. Romney understands the difference between running a business and managing an economy.” The aim of Bain Capital, the private equity firm Romney ran for 15 years, was to make money for its investors, and in that regard Bain surely succeeded, earning $2.5 billion on $1.1 billion invested in 77 deals.  But while Bain itself made money from most or all deals, more than one in five of those arrangements ended with the target company in bankruptcy. If the goal is job creation, Bain Capital is probably the wrong President.

2. Romney’s campaign is a corporation. As the Romney 2012 campaign has moved into high gear, so has the private equity fund Solamere Capital, which is run by Mitt’s son Tagg Romney and Spencer Zwick, who also serves as the top fundraiser on the Romney campaign staff. Solamere was launched with a $10 million investment from Mitt and Ann Romney, and Mitt also has provided strategic advice. “While Solamere has not operated exactly as a subsidiary of the Romney campaign, it has seemed that way at times. The firm shared its first address with the Romney campaign headquarters in Boston. Later, the company was located in the same building as Mr. Romney’s leadership PAC, Free and Strong America….”  Some Solamere employees have been Romney fundraisers, and some Solamere investors are also Romney donors. The intertwined nature of the two ventures — let’s make money while running for President! — shows the prescience of Tim Robbins’ 1992 chilling film comedy Bob Roberts, where campaign staff day-trade stocks right from the candidate’s bus.

3. Romney’s friends are corporations. Romney stepped on his NASCAR message when he told an interviewer that he wasn’t that familiar with the circuit but he had some “great friends” who were NASCAR owners.  It appears that most of Romney’s friends, great or otherwise, own corporations, and some do business with his ventures and contribute to his campaign. One example: On the trail, Romney has pointed to a for-profit college, Florida’s Full Sail University, as an innovative, cost-effective leader in higher education. Nevermind that Full Sail has sky-high prices and, at best, a mixed record when it comes to helping students. Romney did not inform voters that his campaign and Super PAC have received nearly $100,000 from Full Sail CEO Bill Heavener and from C. Kevin Landry, chairman of TA Associates, the private equity firm that owns Full Sail. Nor did he announce that Tagg Romney’s company, Solamere, offered its clients a stake in  TA Associates, which owns not just Full Sail but a number of for-profit schools, including troubled Vatterott Colleges, marked by exploitative recruiting practices and high student loan defaults.  When a candidate endorses his donors’ businesses, without even telling you they are donors (and business associates), there is legitimate concern that those donors might receive favorable treatment after the candidate is elected.

4. Romney’s advisors are corporations. Candidate Romney gets a great deal of policy advice from corporate executives and lobbyists. On February 9, Romney held a fundraising event in Washington, DC. For $10,000 one could participate in a policy roundtable. The energy discussion was led by L.E. Simmons, founder of a Texas private equity firm that invests in energy companies. The infrastructure panel was run by Senator-turned-corporate-lobbyist Jim Talent. The financial institutions component was handled by investment company CEO Richard Breeden. The health care panel was run by former Utah Governor Mike Leavitt, now chair of Leavitt Partners, which advises corporate clients on health care issues. Education was addressed by Bill Hansen, president of testing technology maker Scantron, which sits on the education policy task force of the controversial corporate advocacy group ALEC. And so on. The potential for honest government and meaningful reform is threatened when foxes are guarding all the henhouses.

5. Romney’s donors are corporations. Romney has praised the Supreme Court’s controversial Citizens United decision for opening the door to unlimited election spending for “all corporations.”  And Romney has without reservation encouraged the growth of the pro-Romney Super PAC Restore Our Future, which can accept endless donations from individuals and corporations. The Super PAC, founded by former Romney aides, has spent more than $53 million on ads in the Republican primaries and, gearing up for the general election,  just announced it’s about to spend $4 million for advertising in nine battleground states. Restore Our Future has received $3 million from Texas home builder Bob Perry; $1 million each from F8 LLC and Eli Publishing, two  Utah corporations fronting for former skin-care company exec Steven J. Lund; $1 million from outspoken former Bain Capital exec Edward Conard; and much, much more, allowing a small number of wealthy human people and corporate people to have an enormous influence on the election.

President Obama’s campaign network is also full of corporate and lobbyist influence. But with Mitt Romney, the takeover is complete. People who are alarmed about the growing influence of money in politics need to understand this: Mitt Romney is money in politics.

 

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Filed under: Elections, Plutocrats

Add a comment
  • http://www.facebook.com/leadershipbythepeople Johnny Welch

    “We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few; but we cannot have both.”
    -Louis D. Brandeis

  • Xdiesp

    All of this is true for Obama as well :(

    • Avaritia

      Exactly! Luckily for Brand Obama, he’s discovered a brilliant act with Republicans where he appears to be in favor of something, the Republicans oppose it and he caves it. The guy has enough gumption to then pretend that he tried to do go but was opposed. What a three-ring circus the US has become!

  • Bscharf2

    insider trading is legal in congress and what bothers you is Romney ran a successful corporation that you think he thinks will be the same as running a nation? What is your point? Obama is well funded too, so are most politicians in major elections. Obama also has nationalized a major private industry in health care. He’s shifted the power even more in the wrong direction. This is a capitalist society, not a socialist. Cash injections, debt, and nationalization is all I have seen and you want to call out Romney being rich? How about the 4 million dollar hawaiian vacation the president just took.

    • Avaritia

      All that comment and smack in the middle you sneak that buzz word “socialist” – how utterly dishonest and deluded. You’re criticizing one for doing exactly the same as the other one while the defending one anyway. You people take the cake! BTW, if you think this one took a 4 million dollar Hawaiian “vacation,” how much do you think Mitt’s “vacations” are gonna cost us?

      If you’re gonna criticize, at least be honest and paint both with the same brush but, please, don’t litter the place by criticizing one shill and defend the other one who is at least twice as bad and will be exponentially more destructive and in your face. Admit it: we’re all screwed and leave it at that!

  • Avaritia

    Are you sure the Mittens would be the first corporate appointed president? Are you sure? I urge you to take one good look at one Barak Hussein Obama. It will be hard to top that corporate act, Mitt or not.

    • willbildsten

      Bush was a little bit in bed with corporations too. I think it’s getting worse every single consecutive presidency!

      • Avaritia

        Just a little bit? You are too kind. :)

        It is astounding to see how Obama has taken both the corruption and the police state to new levels though. What a shameful sold out whore!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alan-Lunn/637813505 Alan Lunn

    If you believe the corporeople are going to “restore your future,” Romnitopia also has a bridge to sell you.

  • Pingback: Top Romney Advisor Jim Talent Tied to Coal Lobbying, Wal-Mart Spying -- and Todd Akin | Republic Report()

  • Pingback: David_Halperin: Top Romney Advisor Jim Talent Tied to Coal Lobbying, Walmart Spying — and Todd Akin | Demete - The Breaking News()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: this site()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Cheats for Poptropica()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

  • Pingback: Trackback()

Email
Print